.
We have made a significant change in the introductory page to debunkers.org.
Come check out our new blog that is born on the 10th of May, 2004. Please read the Administrative details and rationale for the change in the homepage.
|
Debunkers
![]() The cow jumped over the moon - the movie.
![]() War of the Stupids
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: War of the Stupids |
|
billholt Member |
It's with little doubt that I relay the opinion that the War of the Worlds is the stupidest movie I've sat through in a long, long time. Now, I'm not one who has a problem with suspending disbelief. Fantasy, sure, bring it on. But please, a little consistency within whatever world you make. Don't be so blatantly obvious with your logical flaws. If I hadn't been surrounded by family members, I would have been sorely tempted to leave during the first 30 minutes, but there was one element of fascination: What will the next deep dumnidity be? The special effects were excellent. The part of the 10 year old little girl was nicely acted. There was nothing else of merit. As stupid as people can be in real life, especially in large groups, these people were movie-stupid. All of them would, in different circumstances, explore the dark basement - armed with a spapler - to see what the blood-curdling sound was. To begin this movie, as the ground is breaking up in front of them, the people are too stupid to get the idea that it might be good to give a little distance. Also, massive EMPs were used in the story to cripple society, but while these EMPs took out simple electric motors and they selectively didn't take out such things as electronic cameras. Later, a lunatic, shotgun waving survivalist is occupying a basement hideout with the two main characters. When the bad guys from outer space decide to explore this very basement ... looking for homemade jelly, I suppose ... that's when the lunatic decides to load the shotgun. I wanted to throw things at the screen. If you care to see this movie, and want to actually enjoy it, I suggest that you drink yourself into near oblivion before going in. With all your brain cells functioning, it won't be fun. [This message has been edited by billholt (edited 07-02-2005).] IP: Logged |
|
Robert Espy Member |
Since I don't watch Cruize movies (though he was great in his first) I got little out of your review other than the word "dumnidity" I don't know if you coined it or not but GW would be oh-so proud. I wish only to ask: are you certain of the spelling? Expect to see the word again by others. Namely me. IP: Logged |
|
gorgas Member |
Any word on the "proper" WOTW movie made by Pendragon Pictures in England, set in the late 19th century as originally written? In the scant trailers I Have seen, it looks like the animation is bad, but then, it often does on anything but a big screen. (anyone happen to notice how the heavily animated film; "Titanic" was not as visually impressive on TV as was the old B&W "Night to Remember"?) Anyway, it does look like they have done some good scene involving the early engagement of the martian fighting machines with the Royal Artillery. The trailer shows the men of the RA in what I am pretty sure are correct period uniforms, and the details of the 12pdr fieldpieces/caissons are correct as far as I can tell. Somewhere I have seen a model or animation of "HMS THUNDERCHILD", and wonder how this scene will play out. Actually, thunderchild is not the "torpedo ram" described by Wells, but an early Torpedo-boat destroyer, prolly HMS Velox or a similar ship. Last I heard, the original release date of March 31 was moved back to some time in Autumn. I wonder, will it ever be shown in CONUS, except maybe at few art cinemas out East. IP: Logged |
|
Steve_V Member |
quote: Obviously you did not see Alone in the Dark. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
billholt Member |
Originally posted by Steve_V: quote: Yes ... I was warned.
Another example: Main character running from the invaders. Entire city electronically dead due to the EMP ... no cars running ... except for one car where the main character told the owner/mechanic to replace the solenoid. Miraculously, that worked but then, with the invaders routing the public in general, or vaporizing them when whim hit, the owner of the auto shop didn't want to let main character have the car because it wasn't his, and the real owner might say bad things that hurt his business. The basic stupidity of the characters, their motivations and the physical situations would be evident even if the flick had been animated. Stinker. Pew pew pew! IP: Logged |
|
Sprengtporten Member |
quote: Actually, this was almost the practice in a movie club I was a member of in 87. The Filmstaden biography had such serial tickets to Filmoteket, you got 10 movies for 100 crowns = 10 dollars. The films were intentionally crap, ranging from scifi-fiascos to societal crictics gone sour. So the club was a sort of underground film club, as if you had imported punk rock scene to film world. It was a common practice to bring in own booze. Filmoteket films always began at 23.00, so after film one was appropriately loaded to enter bars. IP: Logged |
|
billholt Member |
Originally posted by Sprengtporten: quote: I can see this film as being appropriate fodder for such a club. The special effects are pretty good and the actors are pretty enough so that one can rather easily focus on the glaring stupidity of the characters. The house cheer would be "Hey! Look at that idiot! Give me beer!" At the rate of one beer per stupidity, all would be rolled out in wheelbarrows, way too drunk to crawl. [This message has been edited by billholt (edited 07-03-2005).] IP: Logged |
|
entropy Member |
Even though warned here, I was drug to this POS by SO. We walked out 20 minutes into the film. I don't know how it ended but IMDb posters note that the audience was laughhing at the ending. I would welcome spoilers. IP: Logged |
|
Jeff Norman Moderator |
quote:They had to film the movie, didn't they? IP: Logged |
|
billholt Member |
Originally posted by entropy: quote:Sorry about that. Now, perhaps, SO will listen when warned. quote: It ended just like the original, vastly superior film. The original couldn't touch, of course, the special effects. However, the mass of people behaved in a way that one would expect of a group with an average IQ of about 100, which would be about a 30 point advantage over the characters in the remake. IP: Logged |
|
entropy Member |
I warned her. That made her determined to stay. I never walk out of bad movies. She does. When I decided to spend some tme in the lobby she pretended that I had walked out. I would have returned for the ending. I don't recall the previous WOTW. Still waiting for a spoiler. [This message has been edited by entropy (edited 07-04-2005).] IP: Logged |
|
billholt Member |
Well, since I doubt there are two other people who don't know the ending, I'll spill the ending here. Warning! Warning! Warning! Spoiler included in the quote area that follows! quote: [This message has been edited by billholt (edited 07-04-2005).] IP: Logged |
|
Sprengtporten Member |
Since Filmstaden's crapfilm club, I've had this skew-grown idea of a movie theatre specialized to crap films. Naturally, such a theatre would require a big market area. Maybe one has something like that in New York or LA. My business idea would fit the era we live in; recycling is a top priority so wouldn't it be appropriate to recycle film garbage too. Right as well there is demand for experts in problem waste management, and why would problem waste produced by film industry be an exception. [This message has been edited by Sprengtporten (edited 07-04-2005).] IP: Logged |
|
Steve_V Member |
Well hardly a spoiler since most people have known the ending for what....50 yers? I can kind of understand it a little bit way back then, but today even us stupid humans know about this stuff and take precautions. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
DaveL Moderator |
Hey, it may be a stupid ending, but at least they didn't die because of an allergy to water. IP: Logged |
|
LaneH Member |
quote: I have not yet seen it (and I will for the same reason you did) the SO discounts anything posted here just because. Don't marry a catholic-liberal. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Chaon Moderator |
quote: Man that sounds like someone I... Maybe a lawsuit for defamation is is in order? IP: Logged |
|
billholt Member |
Is there something unnatural about lunatic, shot-gun waving survivalists occupying basements? IP: Logged |
|
Chaon Moderator |
Not at all, especially in Nebraska. The defamation suit comes from the movie's portrayal of the survivalist waiting until the last minute to load the shotgun. Damaged reputation and all that. IP: Logged |
|
Psion Member |
quote: Well, to be fair, I had the impression that the attack had started in another part of town and Cruise somehow got to the mechanic (Manny?) before the Tripod did. Manny simply didn't know that a ten-story tall three-legged killing machine from another planet was on its way yet. In fact, as I recall, as Cruise walked up to the mechanic's shop he even said something like "We have two minutes before it gets here." Of course, there's no apparent explanation for why cars, phones, electrical power, and watches would stop working, but a digital camcorder seen in the hands of one victim continued to work. Maybe the owner was a slob who kept the gadget in his microwave or something. Or maybe the lightening EMP had a limited range. But my biggest problem lies with the original story in the first place: no character does anything that amounts to a hill of beans, but the ultimate resolution comes from the actions of the tiniest of creatures put here by God in his wisdom. Talk about deus ex machina! Say what you will about Independence Day as a movie, but at least that film tried to fix this problem. And heck, you mean to tell me that a culture capable of reaching out across interplanetary distances doesn't have enough sense to come to a primitive planet like ours and not drink the water?! IP: Logged |
|
Sprengtporten Member |
quote: Not drink the water ... the entire final solution of the movie clearly demonstrates the urgent need for interplanetary H20 regulation by the Interplanetary EPA. IP: Logged |
|
setnahkt Member |
quote: For an interesting take, try The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. The graphic novel, not the truly awful movie. IP: Logged |
|
DaveL Moderator |
quote:That's one of the problems with SF -- a new and innovative theory (in this case, germs-cause-disease) probably gave a nice plot twist to the book when it was written, but makes it look silly now. The theory has been around for so long and so well accepted, that it's hard for anyone nowadays to believe aliens would be so stupid. SF short stories are replete with this kind of thing. For example, Larry Niven wrote a piece in the 60s titled "THe COldest Place" set in the frigid wastes of the dark side of Mercury. Great idea at the time, but shot to hell by subsequent developments (Mercury isn't tidally locked). As for the 1950's WoW movie, they hung a lantern on the deus-ex-machina-esque plot resolution -- the final scene includes church bells ringing of their own accord. IP: Logged |
|
Sprengtporten Member |
quote: From the point of wiev of estetics, it is difficult to make a scifi-classic, because the technology in the film reflects the real-world technology during the time film is shoot. Films made in 50's look like chrome and blinkers and look coarse now, but given how cars looked like back then it may very well be that they looked as a realistic guess back then. 2001 is a classic, but unfortunately many people cannot see beyond the primitive-looking computer technology in the film. Clarke's person is an another matter. IP: Logged |
|
entropy Member |
De gustibus non est disputandum. http://boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=1845&p=l.htm IP: Logged |
|
entropy Member |
My SO tells me that TMC is celebrating by playing some of the old science fiction movies. IP: Logged |
|
johnl Member |
The 10 year old girl is the omnipresent Dakota Fanning. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0266824/ She has great screen presence, but I don't think she could ever make up for Tom Cruise. IP: Logged |
|
dave fitz Member |
I would not have loaded a shotgun. Rather, i'd have found a 20mm someplace or not bothered. What kind of alien invader doesn't wear flak jackets to an invasion? dave IP: Logged |
|
SPQR Moderator |
Got an alien problem in your neighborhood? Barrett provides. IP: Logged |
|
DaveL Moderator |
Why did the aliens spend so much time hunting down refugees in rural Connecticut, and yet left metropolitan Boston so in tact that the ex-wife looked like she still had running water at her parents' unscathed house? If the machines were buried, indicating that they had been plotting this "for millions of years," why didn 't they just take over the planet, oh, say, millions or years ago? When [spoiler] Robbie [/spoiler] walks out of the parents' house at the end, I was provoked into saying, "oh, shut up" to the screen. I was aimilarly provoked every time Dakota Fanning emitted a high-pitch screetch. On the good side, the tripods' "call to arms" trombone-blast, an obvious homage to Close Encounters, was creepy. [This message has been edited by DaveL (edited 07-11-2005).] IP: Logged |
|
Sam Mc Kee Member |
Where were the Minutemen? IP: Logged |
|
gorgas Member |
quote: Hmmm, I think he was just a statue covered up by dying red martian vines at the end of the film; equivocating the minutemen of Old with the microbes that did in the martians, or some such... The creepy -shotgun guy is portrayed in this film as a dangerous,irresponsible wingnut, obviously an allusion to the contempt the liberal elites have for people who try to take care of themselves, and the intellectual descendants of the Minutemen, in the eyes of the film-maker. Hmmm, alos, it seems like I have seen this character before, oh maybe...Commodore Matt Decker in the original star-trek? He even looks a lot like William Windom in this film, and acts the part the same way. Of course, I would expect a lefty like this what's-his-name to play the part of "survivalist nutjob" to the hilt. Also, the notion that it is futile or even ignoble to resist or survive IP: Logged |
|
entropy Member |
Beau Dietl http://www.beaudietl.com/bd_onetoughcop.htm gave War of the Worlds one tough review on the Don Imus show. I saw him early Monday morning on MSNBC. He said that Bo Jr. insisted that they walk out! [This message has been edited by entropy (edited 07-12-2005).] IP: Logged |
|
Sam Mc Kee Member |
http://www.tomcruiseisnuts.com/home.php IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Personal Safety
Notice: The discussions on this site may address
activities which are inherently dangerous and other
activities which could be dangerous if done improperly.
Many opinions may be expressed. All or none may be valid.
The management of this board has no way of assuring that
any of the opinions expressed are consistent with safe
practices. If you choose to follow any of the
"guidance" expressed on this site and, as a result, blow
three of your fingers off, please let us know about it so
we can laugh at your stupidity. Copyright
Restrictions: You should know the drill by now. If
you post it here, then you promise that you have the
right to do so and pledge to defend and hold harmless
this board and the staff which manages daily
operations.
The staff
reserves the right to edit or delete material you submit
if, in its judgment, your claim is not
reasonable.
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c