.


For your daily dose of debunking, from Steve Milloy,
visit the Junk Science Home Page.


What is Junk Science?


Special rules for this forum.

  Debunkers
  Academia and Medicine
  Professor fired for flunking students

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Professor fired for flunking students
KGB
Moderator
posted 05-14-2008 02:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for KGB     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Link

It's not that the students are struggling with the material; it's that they're not even bothering to show up for class:

quote:

Aird points to a Catch-22 that he said hinders professors’ ability to help students. Because so many students come from disadvantaged backgrounds and never received a good high school education, they are already behind, he said, and attendance is essential. Norfolk State would appear to endorse this point of view, and official university policy states that a student who doesn’t attend at least 80 percent of class sessions may be failed.

The problem, Aird said, is that very few Norfolk State students meet even that standard. In the classes for which he was criticized by the dean for his grading — classes in which he awarded D’s or F’s to about 90 percent of students — Aird has attendance records indicating that the average student attended class only 66 percent of the time. Based on such a figure, he said, “the expected mean grade would have been an F,” and yet he was denied tenure for giving such grades.

Other professors at Norfolk State, generally requesting anonymity, confirmed that following the 80 percent attendance rule would result frequently in failing a substantial share — in many cases a majority — of their students. Professors said attendance rates are considerably lower than at many institutions — although most institutions serve students with better preparation.


IP: Logged

LaneH
Member
posted 05-14-2008 04:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for LaneH     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Norfolk University - do many of the students come from Chesapeake, VA? If so, I am not surprised that they are ill-prepared

------------------
lane h. can be reached at laneman@erols.com
"Never let your mind remain so open that your brain falls out."

IP: Logged

KGB
Moderator
posted 05-14-2008 04:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for KGB     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It's a historically black college that prides itself on extending educational opportunities to poorly prepared students.

Incidentally, Aird is white. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

IP: Logged

Sam Mc Kee
Member
posted 05-14-2008 07:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sam Mc Kee     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by KGB:
It's a historically black college that prides itself on extending educational opportunities to poorly prepared students.

That's fine, but it should mean students who actually give a rat's patoot about their education.

IP: Logged

KGB
Moderator
posted 05-14-2008 08:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for KGB     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Sam Mc Kee:
That's fine, but it should mean students who actually give a rat's patoot about their education.

Agree precisely. I see a place for students who realize their preparation was poor, but are willing to work their tails off to make up for it. I'd hire someone like that in a flash, assuming he wasn't a congenital idiot or something.

But students with the kind of entitlement mentality evident here ... I have no use for.

IP: Logged

LaneH
Member
posted 05-15-2008 06:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for LaneH     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Buh, Meh.

I don't really know what thread to put THIS in because is defies any point that I call even remotely sane.

quote:
During the trial, which was held in Panama City yesterday and today, Ponce de Leon High School’s principal David Davis admitted under oath that he had banned students from wearing any clothing or symbols supporting equal rights for gay people. Davis also testified that he believed rainbows were “sexually suggestive” and would make students unable to study because they’d be picturing gay sex acts in their mind.

The principal went on to admit that while censoring rainbows and gay pride messages he allowed students to wear other symbols many find controversial, such as the Confederate flag.


These are the people that some allow to guide/educate their spawn?

'cause, of course, you all know that sex acts in your house are far worse than overt racism.
------------------
lane h. can be reached at laneman@erols.com
"Never let your mind remain so open that your brain falls out."

[This message has been edited by LaneH (edited 05-15-2008).]

IP: Logged

SPQR
Moderator
posted 05-15-2008 07:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SPQR     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It was wise of us as a society to put all of our stupidest people into the same profession ... it was just a mistake to make it education.

IP: Logged

Sam Mc Kee
Member
posted 05-15-2008 08:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sam Mc Kee     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What about Congress?

IP: Logged

SPQR
Moderator
posted 05-15-2008 08:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SPQR     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Sam Mc Kee:
What about Congress?


Only soaks up 535 of our stupidest ... and while it used to be a harmless place for them - that changed a few decades ago ...

IP: Logged

LaneH
Member
posted 05-15-2008 10:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for LaneH     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by SPQR:
It was wise of us as a society to put all of our stupidest people into the same profession ... it was just a mistake to make it education.

Glomming back onto your dealings with getting a 'cert' to teach on a subject you are both knowledgeable and have experience in TEACHING previously. I am going with the **BOGGLE**

We are doomed.

I was listening to an interview with Fareed Zakaria talking about his latest book The Post-American World this afternoon.

Regardless of his politics, he is probably not too far off. I am off to buy it just to see if what he says about education in the US if where ever it is. And, where is the US going in a really globalized trade world.

Yeah, that was not a really good connect, meh.

------------------
lane h. can be reached at laneman@erols.com
"Never let your mind remain so open that your brain falls out."

IP: Logged

Sam Mc Kee
Member
posted 05-15-2008 10:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sam Mc Kee     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by SPQR:
Only soaks up 535 of our stupidest ... and while it used to be a harmless place for them - that changed a few decades ago ...

There's also their staffs and entourage of lobbyists.

IP: Logged

SPQR
Moderator
posted 05-16-2008 12:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for SPQR     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by LaneH:
I was listening to an interview with Fareed Zakaria talking about his latest book The Post-American World this afternoon.

Regardless of his politics, he is probably not too far off. I am off to buy it just to see if what he says about education in the US if where ever it is. And, where is the US going in a really globalized trade world.

Yeah, that was not a really good connect, meh.


I've not read his book.

However, in general - despite how cynical I am about US education establishment - I take the claims that other countries are ahead of us in education with a huge block of salt. I've heard for decades how India is training more engineers than we are ... and I've had encounters with their engineers that give me little concern that the US will be relegated to selling Indians McDonalds' vegie burgers.

Ditto Japan.

[This message has been edited by SPQR (edited 05-16-2008).]

IP: Logged

KGB
Moderator
posted 05-16-2008 01:02 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for KGB     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
SPQR, I've met a few Indian scientists and engineers, and they've tended to be competent. But they've also tended to have gotten their education here.

I've met very few Japanese engineers or scientists. In fact, I don't remember meeting a single one at Caltech -- although we had a number of mainland Chinese students. I find this curious.

Generally, though, I agree with your take. My sense is that this country tries to balance the two functions of education -- improving competence and sorting -- moderately well in technical fields. (Don't get me going about the liberal majors.) Whereas in Japan, and, I'm guessing, India, sorting is emphasized at the expense of doing much imparting of competence.

Oh, and my data base for this is very extensive: Conversations with a buddy that was a missionary in Japan, became fairly competent in the language, and got to know a few college students there. He said that they hardly bothered to show for class, because the admittance requirements were so rigorous they already had it made the day they matriculated.

Karl probably knows better. "I now stand ready to be judged."

IP: Logged

SPQR
Moderator
posted 05-16-2008 02:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for SPQR     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by KGB:
SPQR, I've met a few Indian scientists and engineers, and they've tended to be competent. But they've also tended to have gotten their education here.

kent, most of my experiences were software related obviously. I am distinguishing the South Asian engineers that I've worked with who had US or Canadian educations from the indigenous. (I have a good friend from Pakistan who has a masters in computer science from McGill if memory serves - brilliant S/W guy )

I consulted with a major telecom company on some software systems and they were having much of their software done by Indian contractors using indigenously trained coders. Some astonishingly bad software - real horrors. Consistent with my experiences in the '90's with software from the South Asian continent. In the late '80's I had a lot of interaction with Japanese software developers on some projects I was involved with then, more competent in the basics but mind-numbingly unimaginative.


That was when I learned of Japan's very odd university system.

[This message has been edited by SPQR (edited 05-16-2008).]

IP: Logged

Chaon
Moderator
posted 05-16-2008 04:26 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Chaon     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by KGB:
He said that they hardly bothered to show for class, because the admittance requirements were so rigorous they already had it made the day they matriculated.

I don't have any experience with Japan, though friends who have lived there suggested the same thing. It also happens here to some extent- Once you gain admittance to a good school, you can slack for the entire time, get the degree, and still be in a strong competitive position for jobs. Thing is, a lot of (don't know %) college students continue with the same habits that got them into the top-tier school in the first place.

The criticisms that expats level against Taiwanese (and most Asian) education is an emphasis on rote memorization over understanding and critical thinking. I don't really know enough about education theory or practice anywhere to have a solid view on this.

IP: Logged

annef
Moderator
posted 05-16-2008 03:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for annef     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Chaon,, I'm a bit conflicted here. There's a time and a place for both rote memorization AND understanding and critical thinking. Consider "new math." Children are virtually taught to teach themselves. It completely baffles me. If more elementary students learned by rote memory, they'd have the basic skills to move on to more easily understanding a subject and comprehend critical thinking.

I'd never've gotten thru algebra without knowing basic maths. A history class teaches history. Certainly one can conjecture about what might've happened had things gone differently (Turtledove), but history (though written by the victors) is lore... it is what it is.

In elementary school I learned to estimate the results of a series of numbers (rounding up or down). That's one of my more frequently used skills.

Once you get to high school, there's room to put critical thinking into play. But it's impossible to do so in English/creative writing, etc. unless you understand basic grammar structure and concepts such as plot and character development. You need to understand basic averages before you can step up to statistics. The list goes on.

If upper grade instructors have not mastered advanced levels of their subject matter, what will they do when a brilliant student out paces them asking "why?"

Anne

IP: Logged

LaneH
Member
posted 05-16-2008 05:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for LaneH     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
However, in general - despite how cynical I am about US education establishment - I take the claims that other countries are ahead of us in education with a huge block of salt. I've heard for decades how India is training more engineers than we are ... and I've had encounters with their engineers that give me little concern that the US will be relegated to selling Indians McDonalds' vegie burgers.

Ditto Japan.


Well, I only listened to about 30 minutes of the discussion, but he wasn't arguing the 'brain drain', actually he made the contra-argument. People educated in the US and going back are great for the world economy.

It's in the mail from the joys of amazon/ebay/the tubes that give me stuff at my computer without moving.

I will put a review in the book forum when after it comes and I read it.

------------------
lane h. can be reached at laneman@erols.com
"Never let your mind remain so open that your brain falls out."

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Debunkers

Personal Safety Notice: The discussions on this site may address activities which are inherently dangerous and other activities which could be dangerous if done improperly. Many opinions may be expressed. All or none may be valid. The management of this board has no way of assuring that any of the opinions expressed are consistent with safe practices. If you choose to follow any of the "guidance" expressed on this site and, as a result, blow three of your fingers off, please let us know about it so we can laugh at your stupidity.

Copyright Restrictions: You should know the drill by now. If you post it here, then you promise that you have the right to do so and pledge to defend and hold harmless this board and the staff which manages daily operations. The staff reserves the right to edit or delete material you submit if, in its judgment, your claim is not reasonable.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c