.
For your daily dose of debunking, from Steve Milloy,
visit the Junk Science Home Page.
Special rules for this forum.
|
Debunkers
![]() Academia and Medicine
![]() Professor fired for flunking students
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Professor fired for flunking students |
|
KGB Moderator |
Link It's not that the students are struggling with the material; it's that they're not even bothering to show up for class:
quote: IP: Logged |
|
LaneH Member |
Norfolk University - do many of the students come from Chesapeake, VA? If so, I am not surprised that they are ill-prepared ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
KGB Moderator |
It's a historically black college that prides itself on extending educational opportunities to poorly prepared students. Incidentally, Aird is white. Not that there's anything wrong with that. IP: Logged |
|
Sam Mc Kee Member |
quote: That's fine, but it should mean students who actually give a rat's patoot about their education. IP: Logged |
|
KGB Moderator |
quote: Agree precisely. I see a place for students who realize their preparation was poor, but are willing to work their tails off to make up for it. I'd hire someone like that in a flash, assuming he wasn't a congenital idiot or something. But students with the kind of entitlement mentality evident here ... I have no use for. IP: Logged |
|
LaneH Member |
Buh, Meh. I don't really know what thread to put THIS in because is defies any point that I call even remotely sane.
quote: These are the people that some allow to guide/educate their spawn? 'cause, of course, you all know that sex acts in your house are far worse than overt racism. [This message has been edited by LaneH (edited 05-15-2008).] IP: Logged |
|
SPQR Moderator |
It was wise of us as a society to put all of our stupidest people into the same profession ... it was just a mistake to make it education. IP: Logged |
|
Sam Mc Kee Member |
What about Congress? IP: Logged |
|
SPQR Moderator |
quote: Only soaks up 535 of our stupidest ... and while it used to be a harmless place for them - that changed a few decades ago ... IP: Logged |
|
LaneH Member |
quote: Glomming back onto your dealings with getting a 'cert' to teach on a subject you are both knowledgeable and have experience in TEACHING previously. I am going with the **BOGGLE** We are doomed. I was listening to an interview with Fareed Zakaria talking about his latest book The Post-American World this afternoon. Regardless of his politics, he is probably not too far off. I am off to buy it just to see if what he says about education in the US if where ever it is. And, where is the US going in a really globalized trade world. Yeah, that was not a really good connect, meh. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Sam Mc Kee Member |
quote: There's also their staffs and entourage of lobbyists. IP: Logged |
|
SPQR Moderator |
quote:I've not read his book. However, in general - despite how cynical I am about US education establishment - I take the claims that other countries are ahead of us in education with a huge block of salt. I've heard for decades how India is training more engineers than we are ... and I've had encounters with their engineers that give me little concern that the US will be relegated to selling Indians McDonalds' vegie burgers. Ditto Japan. [This message has been edited by SPQR (edited 05-16-2008).] IP: Logged |
|
KGB Moderator |
SPQR, I've met a few Indian scientists and engineers, and they've tended to be competent. But they've also tended to have gotten their education here. I've met very few Japanese engineers or scientists. In fact, I don't remember meeting a single one at Caltech -- although we had a number of mainland Chinese students. I find this curious. Generally, though, I agree with your take. My sense is that this country tries to balance the two functions of education -- improving competence and sorting -- moderately well in technical fields. (Don't get me going about the liberal majors.) Whereas in Japan, and, I'm guessing, India, sorting is emphasized at the expense of doing much imparting of competence. Oh, and my data base for this is very extensive: Conversations with a buddy that was a missionary in Japan, became fairly competent in the language, and got to know a few college students there. He said that they hardly bothered to show for class, because the admittance requirements were so rigorous they already had it made the day they matriculated. Karl probably knows better. "I now stand ready to be judged." IP: Logged |
|
SPQR Moderator |
quote:kent, most of my experiences were software related obviously. I am distinguishing the South Asian engineers that I've worked with who had US or Canadian educations from the indigenous. (I have a good friend from Pakistan who has a masters in computer science from McGill if memory serves - brilliant S/W guy ) I consulted with a major telecom company on some software systems and they were having much of their software done by Indian contractors using indigenously trained coders. Some astonishingly bad software - real horrors. Consistent with my experiences in the '90's with software from the South Asian continent. In the late '80's I had a lot of interaction with Japanese software developers on some projects I was involved with then, more competent in the basics but mind-numbingly unimaginative.
[This message has been edited by SPQR (edited 05-16-2008).] IP: Logged |
|
Chaon Moderator |
quote: I don't have any experience with Japan, though friends who have lived there suggested the same thing. It also happens here to some extent- Once you gain admittance to a good school, you can slack for the entire time, get the degree, and still be in a strong competitive position for jobs. Thing is, a lot of (don't know %) college students continue with the same habits that got them into the top-tier school in the first place. The criticisms that expats level against Taiwanese (and most Asian) education is an emphasis on rote memorization over understanding and critical thinking. I don't really know enough about education theory or practice anywhere to have a solid view on this. IP: Logged |
|
annef Moderator |
Chaon,, I'm a bit conflicted here. There's a time and a place for both rote memorization AND understanding and critical thinking. Consider "new math." Children are virtually taught to teach themselves. It completely baffles me. If more elementary students learned by rote memory, they'd have the basic skills to move on to more easily understanding a subject and comprehend critical thinking. I'd never've gotten thru algebra without knowing basic maths. A history class teaches history. Certainly one can conjecture about what might've happened had things gone differently (Turtledove), but history (though written by the victors) is lore... it is what it is. In elementary school I learned to estimate the results of a series of numbers (rounding up or down). That's one of my more frequently used skills. Once you get to high school, there's room to put critical thinking into play. But it's impossible to do so in English/creative writing, etc. unless you understand basic grammar structure and concepts such as plot and character development. You need to understand basic averages before you can step up to statistics. The list goes on. If upper grade instructors have not mastered advanced levels of their subject matter, what will they do when a brilliant student out paces them asking "why?" Anne IP: Logged |
|
LaneH Member |
quote: Well, I only listened to about 30 minutes of the discussion, but he wasn't arguing the 'brain drain', actually he made the contra-argument. People educated in the US and going back are great for the world economy. It's in the mail from the joys of amazon/ebay/the tubes that give me stuff at my computer without moving. I will put a review in the book forum when after it comes and I read it. ------------------ IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Personal Safety
Notice: The discussions on this site may address
activities which are inherently dangerous and other
activities which could be dangerous if done improperly.
Many opinions may be expressed. All or none may be valid.
The management of this board has no way of assuring that
any of the opinions expressed are consistent with safe
practices. If you choose to follow any of the
"guidance" expressed on this site and, as a result, blow
three of your fingers off, please let us know about it so
we can laugh at your stupidity. Copyright
Restrictions: You should know the drill by now. If
you post it here, then you promise that you have the
right to do so and pledge to defend and hold harmless
this board and the staff which manages daily
operations.
The staff
reserves the right to edit or delete material you submit
if, in its judgment, your claim is not
reasonable.
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c