.


For your daily dose of debunking, from Steve Milloy,
visit the Junk Science Home Page.


What is Junk Science?


Special rules for this forum.

  Debunkers
  News Links
  Saudis to behead woman for witchcraft

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Saudis to behead woman for witchcraft
Sam Mc Kee
Member
posted 02-16-2008 07:38 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sam Mc Kee     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Nifong has nothing on these prosecutors.

IP: Logged

LaneH
Member
posted 02-16-2008 08:53 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for LaneH     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
... the rights group described the trial and conviction of Fawza Falih as a miscarriage of justice.

That is not a miscarriage of justice. That is a complete abrogation of the concept of justice.

------------------
lane h. can be reached at laneman@erols.com
"Never let your mind remain so open that your brain falls out."

IP: Logged

10SNE1
Moderator
posted 02-16-2008 11:24 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for 10SNE1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The concept of "religious police" is an abrogation of the concept of justice.

IP: Logged

KGB
Moderator
posted 02-16-2008 11:27 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for KGB     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Saudi is a 16th-century country with huge oil fields worked using 21st-century technology. We really need to start firing up construction of more nuclear power plants.

IP: Logged

10SNE1
Moderator
posted 02-16-2008 01:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 10SNE1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by KGB:
Saudi is a 16th-century country with huge oil fields worked using 21st-century technology. We really need to start firing up construction of more nuclear power plants.


Yup. You know it. I know it. What's it going to take to let enough other people know it to make it happen? A real oil war?

IP: Logged

KGB
Moderator
posted 02-16-2008 01:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for KGB     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by 10SNE1:
Yup. You know it. I know it. What's it going to take to let enough other people know it to make it happen?

I really wonder.

I was at a town planning meeting the other day. We had some professional city planners in town to present the results of their study of our downtown area, which has badly deteriorated over the last couple decades. The meeting was for public participation.

Most comments were reasonable. Bike trails actually make sense in our area and are actually something the city government can be expected to play a role in. Ditto street layouts. Ditto the new town hall and library, and maybe the "interpretive center" with a bus stop and shuttle to Bandelier and the main town site.

A new RV park makes sense, too, to capture some of the tourist traffic to Bandelier and the Caldera. The reasons no one has already taken the initiative to open an RV park have to do with land use regulations in our area, and having the government at least decide how to get out of the way is also a reasonable thing to talk about in a town meeting.

But then someone said that the federal government was likely to required an 80% decrease in transportation energy use in the near future, and would the new town plan take that into account by being compatible with electric street cars? (Our little town has a population of about 6500.) I clamped my mouth shut and decided to let this idiocy just pass -- most of our citizens know better. Then I glanced over at one of the professional town planners, who was sitting close to me. He had a very straight face, but the glance he shot back at me said it all.

Lesson: There are some in our elites who are so mind-boggling idiotic that they are prepared for a sharp decrease in standard of living rather than looking for new energy sources. And this is Los Alamos, where the elites are generally a touch smarter than many other places, at least on technical matters.

Gaaahh.

IP: Logged

Sam Mc Kee
Member
posted 02-16-2008 02:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sam Mc Kee     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
My own home town just rejected the idea of a new power plant, which we desperately need, 'cause it would change our "carbon footprint," whatever the hell that means.

The mention of bike trails makes my eyes roll. They make good sense in places, but where I live they are an excuse to eliminate street parking in front of houses that lack off-street parking in order to punish people who have the audacity to *gasp* drive cars to their jobs. (I haven't yet figured out if it's the car or the having a job that offends the nannies most.)

IP: Logged

10SNE1
Moderator
posted 02-16-2008 02:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 10SNE1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
it would change our "carbon footprint," whatever the hell that means.

Maybe you could ask them for a plaster cast of your town's "carbon footprint".

IP: Logged

annef
Moderator
posted 02-16-2008 03:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for annef     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Nifong isn't even the same ball park as these tribal executioners. 16th century indeed -- ref Salem witch hunts

Yet, today, we have witch hunters actively seeking out miscreants, deniers and debunkers.

Apparently we are doomed to live in a society that has no knowledge of history, philosophy, economics and statistics -- much less science.

Austin, TX, just opted out of investing in a portion of new construction of a nuclear plant. The excuse: not enuf time. (That's actually pretty acceptable to me -- 90 days to make that sort of major capital commitment doesn't begin to touch the time required for due diligence.

At the same time, we going to invest dogs only know how much buck? in a west Texas windfarm. Well, it's always windy in west/north Texas. It might result in a general good. I know not of the technicalities of transmitting wind power. As usual, am delighted to be informed.

As to a carbon footprint, as I've said before, I have a partial carbon toe print (pinkie). That doesn't make me virtuous. It means I'm a penny pincher.

Saw a great bumper sticker yesterday: Save the planet. Stop breathing.

This would also control population, thus dramatically increasing our dependence on foreign oil. Dead people don't use energy, they add value to the dirt. Think of all the predatory plants that would consume our empty cities... just hanging out sucking up CO2. Since humans are awful and dangerous to the environment, you'd think that those committed to excoriating us would be delighted.

It just gets so damned discouraging.

Sorry, poor Saudi woman segued into a general science topic.

I'll think kind thoughts for her.

Anne

IP: Logged

Jeff Norman
Moderator
posted 02-16-2008 08:57 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jeff Norman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
How did that happen?

I guess you're all right but really what about this poor woman? What can be done for her and all the others who do not get covered by the media?

Should we care? I think we should.

Should we do something? I don't see that we can actually do much beyond supporting the human rights groups that provide assistance.

What I find inconceivable is how the Saudis (et al) can live with the embarassment of what their countries do.

And where is the U.N? G.M.A.F.B.

IP: Logged

LaneH
Member
posted 02-17-2008 07:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for LaneH     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Why is our president sucking up to the saudi elites?

And the only answer can be the black sludge under their sand.

------------------
lane h. can be reached at laneman@erols.com
"Never let your mind remain so open that your brain falls out."

IP: Logged

Sam Mc Kee
Member
posted 02-17-2008 08:24 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sam Mc Kee     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I don't think it's that simple. He isn't sucking up to the Iranian Imams, who have the same black sludge.

There was plenty of pressure to drop the sanctions against Saddam. We were told the war would only cost about $80 billion--even if it had only cost that much it would have been much cheaper simply to drop the sanctions, leave him in power and buy his oil.

So I don't think the oil-sheiks-rule-the-world conspiracy explains U.S. foreign policy quite as neatly as the media would have us believe.

IP: Logged

entropy
Member
posted 02-17-2008 11:04 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for entropy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by KGB:
Saudi is a 16th-century country with huge oil fields worked using 21st-century technology. We really need to start firing up construction of more nuclear power plants.


http://pub32.bravenet.com/sitering/show.php?usernum=2709090301
I encountered this nuclear advocacy web ring following posts by Charles Barton on The Oil Drum. He is 65 and blogs at Nuclear Green.. I believe he mentioned that his father was at Los Alamos.

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Debunkers

Personal Safety Notice: The discussions on this site may address activities which are inherently dangerous and other activities which could be dangerous if done improperly. Many opinions may be expressed. All or none may be valid. The management of this board has no way of assuring that any of the opinions expressed are consistent with safe practices. If you choose to follow any of the "guidance" expressed on this site and, as a result, blow three of your fingers off, please let us know about it so we can laugh at your stupidity.

Copyright Restrictions: You should know the drill by now. If you post it here, then you promise that you have the right to do so and pledge to defend and hold harmless this board and the staff which manages daily operations. The staff reserves the right to edit or delete material you submit if, in its judgment, your claim is not reasonable.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c