Debunkers   EPA, FDA, COE, OSHA, etc.   Builder Sues Forest Service Workers Under RICO Act    profile | register | preferences | faq | search

Author	Topic:   Builder Sues Forest Service Workers Under RICO Act
Eboy Member	posted 12-20-2004 01:47 PM             "The three Forest Service employees and Steers said the charges against them are patently false. The government workers maintain that they were acting in their official capacity as Forest Service employees and have done nothing wrong. Steers said Okovita's suit was brought partly 'to intimidate other activists from speaking out. That won't work,' she said." http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-eagles20dec20,0,5251990.story IP: Logged
Casper Member	posted 12-20-2004 02:34 PM             quote: "Defendants were not at all concerned about the bald eagles or the effect the project might have on the eagle," the suit alleges. Rather, Rosenbaum said that the defendants wanted to kill the project, "which would serve to increase their own property values." ... In particular, the suit alleges that Scott Eliason improperly advised Friends of Fawnskin on ways that the project might be derailed and that Robin Eliason prepared an inaccurate report on the bald eagle situation in an effort to block the project. Sounds like the treehuggers I went to school with. It was common knowledge that a FS job could allow you to live in a near pristine wilderness affordably. So what if you have 6 years living with your parents while you are on the waiting list; eventually you'll have a gold mine and you'll be the ad-hoc neighborhood association. IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)	next newest topic | next oldest topic
Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
	Hop to: Select a Forum or Archive List of Forums: Category: This Board and its functions. --------------------Welcome, Administrative: Suggestions & ComplaintsNews LinksThe Smoke Filled Back Room Category: Basis and methods-What is Junk Science? Why does it exist? --------------------PhilosophyPolyconMath, Statistics and the Scientific MethodNew Energy Thoughts Category: The wonderful worlds of junk science. --------------------PotpourriGlobal warmingDemon TobaccoBiotechnologyChemophobiaOh woe is us!Physics, Astronomy, and CosmologySociology Category: Primary Sources-the believers, the gullible and the greedy. --------------------The media.EPA, FDA, COE, OSHA, etc.Business - big and smallEconomicsPETA, Greenpeace and "Citizens groups"Academia and MedicineBooks -- Good and BadThe cow jumped over the moon - the movie.Mixed nuts? List of Archives: Arch2008 Business - big and small

Personal Safety Notice: The discussions on this site may address activities which are inherently dangerous and other activities which could be dangerous if done improperly. Many opinions may be expressed. All or none may be valid. The management of this board has no way of assuring that any of the opinions expressed are consistent with safe practices. If you choose to follow any of the "guidance" expressed on this site and, as a result, blow three of your fingers off, please let us know about it so we can laugh at your stupidity. Copyright Restrictions: You should know the drill by now. If you post it here, then you promise that you have the right to do so and pledge to defend and hold harmless this board and the staff which manages daily operations. The staff reserves the right to edit or delete material you submit if, in its judgment, your claim is not reasonable.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c